Wednesday, February 24, 2021

 So... many years have passed since my last post. The PhD was successfully done in late 2010 and life went on its due course! 

So... what did I learned during this whole process? A couple of things.

1) Don't expect people to tell you what to do! It's your PhD, your research, your chosen topic, your edge-research. 

2) Don't talk, just do! Don't spend too much time babbling about your ideas. Just dig deep and implement them and then check if they hold or fail.

3) More than collaborators, make friends! Collaborations end at some point; friends stay for life.

4) If you have the opportunity, expose yourself. Take hold of every chance you have to travel and present your work all around. Take all the courses you need in abroad schools. You will hardly experience this kind of life again, even if you succeed in your career.  

5) Try to make something practical. Even you are working on some highly advanced theoretical concept (like string theory, mathematical manifold differential geometry, DNA/molecular/bio-stuff..., whatever), try to impart some of your knowledge to younger kids (do science outreach, seminars, volunteering, etc.). The society appreciates these things and they bring joy to your soul.

6) Don't drag things too much. Try, fail, recover, try, fail, recover, try, obtain some result, move on to next target... Life is short.

7) Try to enjoy some parts of the process.


Cheers and happy PhD.
DP

Monday, April 7, 2008

Empty vessels make the most noise...

Ain't life a funny thing?!? In my last post I talked about a paper that we submitted and was not approved for publication. The same week we submitted that paper, we submitted another one with much less content and scientific content, to another magazine...
Now the result came and the paper is accepted. Even better than that, the referee thought that the paper was "new, fresh and inspiring"!! WTF!!!!!!!!
I really swear that I don't understand nothing more. A beautifully written paper with lot of science get "kicked" and a simple draft with more bla, bla, bla than science is "inspiring"?? Please don't take me wrong. I'm very glad that the paper was accepted for publication, but the different reaction of both referees is just mindboggling. Probably we cited some works of the referee, who knows!? That old saying comes to my mind: Empty vessels make the most noise...

Friday, January 18, 2008

Work hard, write paper, and cry...

Hello folks!
It has quite some time since write anything here. Well, that's a sign of how busy I have been lately. After the summer, we start working in two research papers, that we ended up submitting by the end of November. Now after almost two months the report of the referee comes back and it came with a sour, bitter taste! The referee just kicked our asses into the street, stripped us naked and dragged through an old road with our feet tied up to a pickup truck. Well, sort of!
This is what happens when you try to enter in a mainstream research field and you dare to present new ideas. At least that is what my adviser said. I think that we probably didn't cite any of the referee's work and he didn't like it. Who knows, right?
The main problem is that the referee was too emotive in the report and didn't criticize the core of the paper, he just bashed the concept that we are trying to introduce. Now we have to figure out a way of putting our words in a more clear way. If at least my adviser could help me on this! NOT!!!!

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

I want my vacations!!!!!

Almost everybody in my Lab. as gone in vacations and I feel just like a poor damned soul binded to this books for eternity. Does anyone understand my feelings??
This week's challenge is to do curve fit that involves about 19 free parameters. 19!!! This thing is more unstable than a drunk guy in a spring break.
I delivered a paper to my adviser a few weeks ago and he was supposed to read it and give me some feedback. I'm still waiting for is opinion... Ok, the paper has no breakthrough but the results are interesting (to someone I hope) and deserve to be at least submitted to a magazine. At least the referee could say if it is a stupid or good idea. But nooooo, the paper is still in his drawer.
"Could you do a little more", he says. Yes I can, BUT WHAT??? Please advise me! That is part of the job of being an adviser, no?

Next week I'm going home, with or without the paper submitted.


Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Calculus in MHD - Oh my God, what a mess...


This time around I have been playing with MHD equations and I have to say, "WHO THE HECK CAME UP WITH THIS SHI*...". I'm no theoretician so I feel just like a blind cook trying to prepare an exquisite plate of "aut cuizine française" or something like that.
I have to figure out a way of passing beyond theses awful calculations in order to continue my research.

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Money Money

Today is a gooooood day. After three years in a row, applying for a PhD Grant I finally got it.

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Day 0

Easter has just finish, everybody is still in vacations (except me) and today I decided to speak.
This will be my diary in this voyage called "PhD in Astrophysics"...